|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Adingo Ate'mybaby
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 15:05:00 -
[1]
This thread confirms beyond doubt that people who drive New Minis are bat**** crazy.
|
Adingo Ate'mybaby
|
Posted - 2010.05.08 19:07:00 -
[2]
Originally by: NereSky
Obviously what ive stated before hasnt been read or understood;
Employment is a contract between two parties, one being the employer and the other being the employee. An employee may be defined as: "A person in the service of another under any contract of hire, express or implied, oral or written, where the employer has the power or right to control and direct the employee in the material details of how the work is to be performed." Black's Law Dictionary page 471 (5th ed. 1979).
so point 6 is irrelevant and so is point 7 - and tbh all this is political desperation in trying to smear someone that is only volunteering her time to help pass players comments and concerns to CCP is getting tiresome,
I can understand RL politicians conducting a constant smear campaign as they get paid untold fortunes in costs and guarrenteed future income etc but not game players - all the potential CSM's are trying to do is make a differance.
The fact that you don't get why people are doing this just shows a fundamental lack of understanding of the issue at hand. Read all of her quotes and campaign messages without the 'fanboi' rose-tinted glasses you appear to be sporting and you will see that she has made it her mission to try to negatively change the preferred play-style for a lot of people. If you still don't get it, then you really are playing the wrong game.
|
Adingo Ate'mybaby
|
Posted - 2010.05.09 00:00:00 -
[3]
Originally by: NereSky
Originally by: Adingo Ate'mybaby
Originally by: NereSky
Obviously what ive stated before hasnt been read or understood;
Employment is a contract between two parties, one being the employer and the other being the employee. An employee may be defined as: "A person in the service of another under any contract of hire, express or implied, oral or written, where the employer has the power or right to control and direct the employee in the material details of how the work is to be performed." Black's Law Dictionary page 471 (5th ed. 1979).
so point 6 is irrelevant and so is point 7 - and tbh all this is political desperation in trying to smear someone that is only volunteering her time to help pass players comments and concerns to CCP is getting tiresome,
I can understand RL politicians conducting a constant smear campaign as they get paid untold fortunes in costs and guarrenteed future income etc but not game players - all the potential CSM's are trying to do is make a differance.
The fact that you don't get why people are doing this just shows a fundamental lack of understanding of the issue at hand. Read all of her quotes and campaign messages without the 'fanboi' rose-tinted glasses you appear to be sporting and you will see that she has made it her mission to try to negatively change the preferred play-style for a lot of people. If you still don't get it, then you really are playing the wrong game.
If i was playing the wrong game then i would have discovered that approx 6 years ago
So you've played for 6 years and still fail to see how her proposed changes would negatively impact the game? Wow... just wow.
|
Adingo Ate'mybaby
|
Posted - 2010.05.10 22:11:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Droog 1
Many truthful things
You left out:-
Candidate thinks Puzzle Pirates (a kiddies game for christsakes, I mean.. really??) is vastly superior to EVE.
|
Adingo Ate'mybaby
|
Posted - 2010.05.11 09:57:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Stevakis
Sorry but that so-called evidence has already been proven false most of the time.
Bolded the pertinent part. So you agree that in places she has misrepresented herself and/or the facts, yet you still think she's a great canditate. Astounding.
|
Adingo Ate'mybaby
|
Posted - 2010.05.11 15:45:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Stevakis None of you trolls ever had a dispute in corp chat, and never insulted anyone, of course? Care to make your logs public?
How many of the trolls are running for a public position with social responsibilities?
Most people know where to draw the line when having a disagreement with someone, and what was said in that corp chat goes far and beyond anything that any rational human being would consider decent, regardless of how mad you are. What happens in CSM meetings if she doesn't like what's being said?
And it doesn't matter how many times you use the emoticon, what she has done is still indefensible.
|
Adingo Ate'mybaby
|
Posted - 2010.05.12 15:47:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
Originally by: Fly1 Sup ya'll. Thought I would share some interesting things from the being in CSM channel thingy a couple days ago. Enjoy.
-----
[10:42:18] Ankhesentapemkah > So the worse this game does, it opens up more room for other space related games to have breathing room and a better shot at the pie.
[10:42:36] Ankhesentapemkah > Kind of like the one we are working on. ;)
[10:42:52] Ankhesentapemkah > isn't that industrial sabatoge?
[10:43:09] Ankhesentapemkah > Industrial sabotage is too harsh of a word but you get the idea.
-----
This relevant to this thread
False logs. I don't use the "shot at the pie" expression nor do I use the ;) smiley like that. Try harder when trying to slander.
So this you deny, but you don't dispute the logs where you are essentially taking the **** out of someone's autistic child? Brilliant.
|
|
|
|